Update generics lecture

This commit is contained in:
Pavel 2023-04-02 01:02:32 +04:00
parent fec063259b
commit 80c59db2b1
2 changed files with 171 additions and 20 deletions

View file

@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
generics Generics
Лекция 8 Лекция 8
Арсений Балобанов Арсений Балобанов
* Generics * Generics
* New language features * Generics features
- Type parameters for functions and types - Type parameters for functions and types
- Type sets - Type sets
@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ A type parameter list
} }
- The constraint is an interface, but the actual type argument can be any type that implements that interface. - The constraint is an interface, but the actual type argument can be any type that implements that interface.
- The scope of a type parameter starts at the opening "[" and ends at the end of the generic type or function declaration - The scope of a type parameter starts at the opening "[" and ends at the end of the generic type or function.
* Using generic Sort * Using generic Sort
@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ What happens when we call Sort?
- Instantiate book-specific function - Instantiate book-specific function
#Sort[book] | (list []book) Sort[book] | (list []book)
* Type-checking a generic call * Type-checking a generic call
@ -113,6 +113,10 @@ Invocation (as usual)
any stands for "no constraint" (same as "interface{}") any stands for "no constraint" (same as "interface{}")
Moreover,
type any = interface{}
* Sort, decomposed * Sort, decomposed
type Lesser[T any] interface{ type Lesser[T any] interface{
@ -121,7 +125,7 @@ any stands for "no constraint" (same as "interface{}")
func Sort[Elem Lesser[Elem]](list []Elem) func Sort[Elem Lesser[Elem]](list []Elem)
* Problems * Problem
what we want what we want
@ -135,17 +139,34 @@ what we could do
func (x myInt) Less(y myInt) bool { return x < y } func (x myInt) Less(y myInt) bool { return x < y }
but what if ...
* Problem
there is one nice solution
// orderedSlice is an internal type that implements sort.Interface.
// The Less method uses the < operator. The Ordered type constraint
// ensures that T has a < operator.
type orderedSlice[T constraints.Ordered] []T
func (s orderedSlice[T]) Len() int { return len(s) }
func (s orderedSlice[T]) Less(i, j int) bool { return s[i] < s[j] }
func (s orderedSlice[T]) Swap(i, j int) { s[i], s[j] = s[j], s[i] }
func Sort[T constraints.Ordered](s []T) {
sort.Sort(orderedSlice[T](s))
}
* min * min
.play -edit min/basic/min.go /^func min/,/^}/ .play -edit min/basic/min.go /^func min/,/^}/
* Generic min * Generic min
.play -edit min/basic/min.go /^func min/,/^}/
.play -edit min/generic/min.go /^func min/,/^}/ .play -edit min/generic/min.go /^func min/,/^}/
* Calling generic min calling generic min
m := min[int](1, 2) m := min[int](1, 2)
@ -156,7 +177,7 @@ what we could do
* Generic type * Generic type
type Tree[T interface{}] struct { type Tree[T any] struct {
left, right *Tree[T] left, right *Tree[T]
data T data T
} }
@ -175,9 +196,9 @@ what we could do
func min[T constraints.Ordered](x, y T) T { func min[T constraints.Ordered](x, y T) T {
- constraints.Ordered defines a set of values T can have - constraints.Ordered defines a set of types T can be
* constaints.Ordered * constraints.Ordered
// Ordered is a constraint that permits any ordered type: any type // Ordered is a constraint that permits any ordered type: any type
// that supports the operators < <= >= >. // that supports the operators < <= >= >.
@ -190,7 +211,7 @@ what we could do
- The < operator is supported by every type in this subset - The < operator is supported by every type in this subset
- ~T means with underlying type T - ~T means with underlying type T
* constaints * constraints
type Signed interface { type Signed interface {
~int | ~int8 | ~int16 | ~int32 | ~int64 ~int | ~int8 | ~int16 | ~int32 | ~int64
@ -212,7 +233,22 @@ what we could do
~complex64 | ~complex128 ~complex64 | ~complex128
} }
* Constaints & type sets * comparable
built-in identifier for anything that can be compared via ==
func SetFrom[T comparable](s []T) map[T]struct{} {
m := make(map[T]struct{}, len(s))
for _, v := range s {
m[v] = struct{}{}
}
return m
}
since go 1.20 comparable also allows interfaces
* Constraints & type sets
[T aConstraint] [T aConstraint]
@ -220,7 +256,24 @@ what we could do
- interface has a type set - interface has a type set
- type set defines the types that are permissible - type set defines the types that are permissible
* Constaint literals * Constraints & type sets
type OrderedStringer interface {
constraints.Ordered // Type set
fmt.Stringer // And stringer as well
}
type Int int
func (i Int) String() string { return strconv.Itoa(int(i)) }
func MaxString[T OrderedStringer](a, b T) string {
if a > b {
return a.String()
}
return b.String()
}
* Constraint literals
[S interface{~[]E}, E interface{}] [S interface{~[]E}, E interface{}]
@ -228,14 +281,14 @@ what we could do
[S ~[]E, E interface{}] [S ~[]E, E interface{}]
- any is a new predeclared identifier — an alias for interface{} in a constraint - any is a predeclared identifier — an alias for interface{} in a constraint
[S ~[]E, E any] [S ~[]E, E any]
* Type inference * Type inference
- Type inference is complicated but usage is simple - Type inference is complicated but usage is simple
- Programms that don't need type arguments today won't need them tomorrow - Programs that don't need type arguments today won't need them tomorrow
* Scale * Scale
@ -301,8 +354,8 @@ Why don't we need explicit type parameters?
Scale(p, 2) Scale(p, 2)
- p is []Point => S is Point - p is Point => S is Point
- 2 is untyped constant => no info - 2 is untyped constant => E is numeric
* Constraint type inference * Constraint type inference
@ -336,7 +389,27 @@ Why don't we need explicit type parameters?
or with inlined constraint or with inlined constraint
func foo[T any, PT interface{*T}](p PT) func f[T any, PT interface{*T}](p PT)
* Output type instantiation
func CallJSONRPC[Output any](method string) (Output, error) {
var output Output
resBytes, err := doCall(method)
if err != nil {
return output, err
}
err = json.Unmarshal(resBytes, &output)
return output, err
}
now we don't need to write boilerplate for unmarshalling
res, err := CallJSONRPC[BatchReadResponse]("batch_read")
but no type inference in this case
* When to use generics * When to use generics
@ -344,6 +417,67 @@ or with inlined constraint
- More efficient memory use. - More efficient memory use.
- (Significantly) better performance. - (Significantly) better performance.
* When not to use generics
we can write
func Concat[T fmt.Stringer](a, b T) string {
return a.String() + b.String()
}
but why not just
func Concat(a, b fmt.Stringer) string {
return a.String() + b.String()
}
P.S. are these functions equivalent?
- Type parameter be replaced by simple interface
* When not to use generics
.play skip/skip.go
just skip this slide...
* Some problems
func Smallest[E ~[]T, T constraints.Ordered](e E) (T, error) {
if len(e) == 0 {
var zero T
return zero, errors.New("empty slice provided")
}
s := e[0]
for _, v := range e[1:] {
is v < s {
s = v
}
}
return s, nil
}
- No way to inline zero value
* Some problems
func Mul[T string | int](t T, cnt int) T {
switch v := any(t).(type) {
case string:
v = strings.Repeat(v, cnt)
return *(*T)(unsafe.Pointer(&v))
case int:
v *= cnt
return *(*T)(unsafe.Pointer(&v))
}
panic("impossible type")
}
- No way to determine the instantiated type statically
- No function overloading
- No way to express convertibility
* Summary * Summary
Generics are type-checked macros. Generics are type-checked macros.
@ -362,6 +496,6 @@ Use
* Ссылки * Ссылки
.link https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/refs/heads/master/design/go2draft-contracts.md - generics design draft .link https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/refs/heads/master/design/43651-type-parameters.md - generics design proposal
.link https://blog.golang.org/why-generics - The Go Blog - Why Generics? .link https://blog.golang.org/why-generics - The Go Blog - Why Generics?
.link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TborQFPY2IM - GopherCon 2020, Robert Griesemer - Typing [Generic] Go .link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TborQFPY2IM - GopherCon 2020, Robert Griesemer - Typing [Generic] Go

View file

@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
package main
import "fmt"
func F[T ~[]T](t T) T {
return t[1][3][3][7][6][6][6]
}
type G []G
func main() {
g := make(G, 10)
for i := range g {
g[i] = g
}
fmt.Println(F(g))
}