erius/shad-go
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
shad-go/tools/testtool/testdata/coverage/sum/subpkg/empty_test.go

25 lines
352 B
Go
Raw Normal View History

Support test coverage requirements via comment.
2020-03-18 22:19:44 +00:00
// This is subpkg package comment.
package subpkg
// Incorrect coverage comments:
Add coverpkg specification. Currently, packages in coverme without tests created by student are not checked for coverage, because no there are no test targets for them at all! The issue can be fixed by simply creating empty !change files, but we are engineers, aren't we? :) Bonus point: it prevents new packages from giving false coverage credit. For example, mock file generated by gomock will have lots of covered code almost instantly. However, the task can be hacked by adding new code to existing packages.
2020-03-22 00:26:50 +00:00
// min coverage: . -1%
Support test coverage requirements via comment.
2020-03-18 22:19:44 +00:00
Add coverpkg specification. Currently, packages in coverme without tests created by student are not checked for coverage, because no there are no test targets for them at all! The issue can be fixed by simply creating empty !change files, but we are engineers, aren't we? :) Bonus point: it prevents new packages from giving false coverage credit. For example, mock file generated by gomock will have lots of covered code almost instantly. However, the task can be hacked by adding new code to existing packages.
2020-03-22 00:26:50 +00:00
// min coverage: . 100.001%
Support test coverage requirements via comment.
2020-03-18 22:19:44 +00:00
Add coverpkg specification. Currently, packages in coverme without tests created by student are not checked for coverage, because no there are no test targets for them at all! The issue can be fixed by simply creating empty !change files, but we are engineers, aren't we? :) Bonus point: it prevents new packages from giving false coverage credit. For example, mock file generated by gomock will have lots of covered code almost instantly. However, the task can be hacked by adding new code to existing packages.
2020-03-22 00:26:50 +00:00
// min coverage: . 100 %
Support test coverage requirements via comment.
2020-03-18 22:19:44 +00:00
Add coverpkg specification. Currently, packages in coverme without tests created by student are not checked for coverage, because no there are no test targets for them at all! The issue can be fixed by simply creating empty !change files, but we are engineers, aren't we? :) Bonus point: it prevents new packages from giving false coverage credit. For example, mock file generated by gomock will have lots of covered code almost instantly. However, the task can be hacked by adding new code to existing packages.
2020-03-22 00:26:50 +00:00
// min coverage:. 10%
Support test coverage requirements via comment.
2020-03-18 22:19:44 +00:00
Add coverpkg specification. Currently, packages in coverme without tests created by student are not checked for coverage, because no there are no test targets for them at all! The issue can be fixed by simply creating empty !change files, but we are engineers, aren't we? :) Bonus point: it prevents new packages from giving false coverage credit. For example, mock file generated by gomock will have lots of covered code almost instantly. However, the task can be hacked by adding new code to existing packages.
2020-03-22 00:26:50 +00:00
// min coverage: . 19%
// min coverage: 90%
Support test coverage requirements via comment.
2020-03-18 22:19:44 +00:00
// Correct coverage comment:
Add coverpkg specification. Currently, packages in coverme without tests created by student are not checked for coverage, because no there are no test targets for them at all! The issue can be fixed by simply creating empty !change files, but we are engineers, aren't we? :) Bonus point: it prevents new packages from giving false coverage credit. For example, mock file generated by gomock will have lots of covered code almost instantly. However, the task can be hacked by adding new code to existing packages.
2020-03-22 00:26:50 +00:00
// min coverage: . 90%
Support test coverage requirements via comment.
2020-03-18 22:19:44 +00:00
// Testtool uses first matching comment.
Add coverpkg specification. Currently, packages in coverme without tests created by student are not checked for coverage, because no there are no test targets for them at all! The issue can be fixed by simply creating empty !change files, but we are engineers, aren't we? :) Bonus point: it prevents new packages from giving false coverage credit. For example, mock file generated by gomock will have lots of covered code almost instantly. However, the task can be hacked by adding new code to existing packages.
2020-03-22 00:26:50 +00:00
// min coverage: . 91%
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink